But lets not pretend this was the original idea and hide Microsoft's fail once again with fanboyism. I told Daniel here multiple times in the comment section about this and yes at this point he is right - UWP stands for all this things NOW. You have the full right, of course, to write whatever you want in your sites and blogs and continue to convince people as you are Microsoft related news provider and have interest in MS's success. Those tools DO NOT generate touch friendly NATIVE APP content for Windows and everybody sober on the planet knows this. All those bridges, porting tools, 'Web'ification (don't care about the PWA term, Electron and such web frameworks (Daniel, you're not even a developer to talk about what's this, when only reading the 'brochure')) now count ONLY because Microsoft FAILED MISERABLY with their strategy. NET, with more than 10 years of professional experience, including Windows Phone and UWP), I can tell you everything Microsoft initially wanted was UWP to stand for XAML + C# and thats ALL.

As a C# developer too (and btw all other sorts of tech, including C++, but revolving mainly around Microsoft's.

Best computer software 2017